Before, I still tried to alternate between paper and app because I was not satisfied with either of them. With release of Things 3, my problems with apps stopped. It was still much better then OF, which - especially from 2.0 version - I considered absolute mismatch for my need and preference - it became clearly horror of anxiety of loosing tasks - they disappeared somewhere, settings were difficult, app was so heavyweight that organizing/using it became more difficult project than real projects etc. I had problems with some features and app was little bit clumpy for me. I used Things before 3.0 version but switch away from it from time to time. I am enthusiastic user of Things 3 and I was never so satisfied with any task app and I tried them all (literary and really). Warning: biased review/experience I cannot agree with the article (or Seraphim's cited paragraph). The real core thing is what you want and how to get it. OF, TH, and TP the software in un important. So I keep OF and I am awaiting OF3 with tags. But for myself it is less powerfull than omnifocus. It is pretty, it is effective, it is simple. Things is great for people who just want an excellent task manager and who loke working by time fixed ie today, active, someday. No specific views such as all your business. But when it is done what a power ! You can do almost anything and for GTD it is fantastic. It needs a real thinking about how you work and what you are waiting for "your system" If is the path of difficulties. One is project, the secont is context and the third is Perspective. The core power of Omnifocus is in 3 subject. Now I went back to Omnifocus and I definitively stay with it. Things is just easier than OF and Taskpaper is the pimpliest of all. It's amazing I did exactly the same OF>TASKPAPER>OF>THINGS>OF -) I dont think there is one software more effective than other.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |